tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8259216.post6742183497631985..comments2023-05-17T18:09:13.938+08:00Comments on Bluez: PicasawebZimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07636995260487448762noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8259216.post-7538802591289102192007-02-26T07:15:00.000+08:002007-02-26T07:15:00.000+08:00Thanks Ivan!That's roughly what I thought. Picasaw...Thanks Ivan!<BR/><BR/>That's roughly what I thought. Picasaweb seems to be more in the comfort zone of the usual "this is my past" kind of shots. Flickr's structure is interesting, but I don't want to put up something so mundane there. I haven't really got a grasp on what <I> would </I> fit in well there yet though.Zimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07636995260487448762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8259216.post-70621242912033778142007-02-26T00:03:00.000+08:002007-02-26T00:03:00.000+08:00It's really down to what you want. I'm more famili...It's really down to what you want. I'm more familiar with Flickr than Picasaweb. What I understand is that Flickr allows 100MB free uploads per month (for free accounts), whereas Picasaweb has max of 250MB total. <BR/><BR/>The downside (for free accounts) is Flickr only shows up 200 pictures at any one time, although older pics are still there but just not visible.<BR/><BR/>Flickr is more established and has more users (so if you want to belong in a wider community, that' a consideration).<BR/><BR/>Flickr seems to be more "community-friendly", i.e. a "Add Notes" feature, tagging. Not sure if Picasaweb has those. From what I saw at your album, Picasaweb seems to be more suitable as a online album whereas Flickr is more about community pooling of images.Ivan Chewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02727226573817276108noreply@blogger.com